Assignment: NURS6052 Walden Essentials
Assignment: NURS6052 Walden Essentials
Assignment: NURS6052 Walden Essentials
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT :Assignment: NURS6052 Walden Essentials
Question Description
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3. THESE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN INPUT INTO THE TEMPLATE FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE
Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources. THAT TOOL IS BELOW
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:
An evaluation table
A levels of evidence table
An outcomes synthesis table
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
Critical Appraisal Tools Worksheet Template
Evaluation Table
Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Full citation of selected article
Article #1
Article #2
Article #3
Article #4
Cotogni, P., Barbero, C., & Rinaldi, M. (2015).
Deep sternal wound infection after cardiac
surgery: Evidences and controversies.
World journal of critical care medicine, 4(4),
265–273. doi:10.5492/wjccm. v4.i4.265.
Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles
/PMC4631871/
Kubota, H., Miyata, H., Motomura, N., Ono, M.,
Takamoto, S., Harii, K., … Kyo, S. (2013).
Deep sternal wound infection after
cardiac surgery. Journal of cardiothoracic
surgery, 8, 132. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-8-132.
Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pmc/articles/PMC3663691/
Simek, M., Chudoba, A., Hajek, R.,
Tobbia, P., Molitor, M., &
Nemec, P. (2018). From open
packing to negative wound
pressure therapy: A critical overview
of deep sternal wound infection
treatment strategies after cardiac surgery. Biomedical Papers Of
The Medical Faculty Of The University
Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. doi:10.5507/bp.2018.053.https://org.exp.waldenulibrary.org/doi:10.5507/bp.2018.053
Simor, A. E. (2011). Staphylococcal
decolonisation: An effective strategy
for prevention of infection?
The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 11(12),
952-62.
Retrieved from
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=
https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/
docview/906522531?accountid=14872
Conceptual Framework
Describe the theoretical basis for the study
Design/Method Describe the design
and how the study
was carried out
Sample/Setting
The number and
characteristics of
patients,
attrition rate, etc.
Major Variables Studied
List and define dependent and independent variables
Measurement
Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions
Data Analysis
Statistical or
qualitative
findings
Findings and Recommendations
General findings and recommendations of the research
Appraisal
Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of
use in your practice?
General Notes/Comment
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
:

Order Now

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!