Assignment: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment

NUR 590 Section A Assignment: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review

Assignment: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment

Question Description

Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment

It is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization’s readiness.

Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results of the survey, addressing your organization’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, and how to integrate clinical inquiry, providing strategies that strengthen the organization’s weaker areas.
Make sure to include the rationale for the survey category scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details or examples. Explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization.
Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.
Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review

you developed a PICOT statement and literature review for a population quality initiative:

PICOT: Among Geriatric patients in a skilled nursing facility (P) Do Implementation of hourly rounds, use of bed alarms, and nursing staff education (I) compared to use of bed alarm only (C) decrease the rate of falls (O) over 8weeks period (T)?

In 750 words, include the following:

Refine your PICOT into a proposal or problem statement.
Provide a summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations.
General Guidelines:

You are required to cite five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

Assignment: Organizational Culture & Readiness

Assignment: Organizational Culture & Readiness

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Satisfactory (88.00%)
Good (92.00%)
Excellent (100.00%)

A discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is present.
A discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

A proposal or problem statement is present.
A proposal or problem statement is clearly provided and well developed.
A proposal or problem statement is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

A summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is present.
A summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!