Assignment:Cardiovascular Disease and Diet
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT : Assignment:Cardiovascular Disease and Diet  
Assignment:Cardiovascular Disease and Diet
APA Reference for Article: Merriman, S. (2013). Cardiovascular disease and diet: the way to a healthy heart. Nursing & Residential Care, 15(1), 22-25 4p.
Type of Source:
Is it Research (peer-reviewed article) or Non-research systematic review, clinical practice guidelines, organizational experience, or expert opinion/case study/literature review. Research (peer- reviewed article)
Strength of Research:
Discuss the strength of the sources. Report if evidence is High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Use the tools on page 238-244 of your text and discuss the reasons why you have assigned a particular level of quality. The strength of the source is good. The results were clearly stated providing details of the results. Limitations were discussed and provided. The article clearly stated the investigation discussed and included supporting details.
Brief Description of Research:
Address the questions in your summary:
*How does the information in the article apply to the project problem or proposed intervention?
*Summarize in your own words.
* Include results of the study and how these results are applicable to your project.
* What is the recommendation of the source for clinical practice? The information provided in this article applies to the intervention proposed because it directly states reason to follow a healthy diet, how to follow a healthy diet and how it can improve your health.
Article #4
APA Reference for Article:
Type of Source:
Is it Research (peer-reviewed article) or Non-research systematic review, clinical practice guidelines, organizational experience, or expert opinion/case study/literature review.
Assignment:Cardiovascular Disease and Diet
Assignment:Cardiovascular Disease and Diet
Assignment:Cardiovascular Disease and Diet
Strength of Research:
Discuss the strength of the sources. Report if evidence is High, Good, or Low/Major Flaw. Use the tools on page 238-244 of your text and discuss the reasons why you have assigned a particular level of quality.
Brief Description of Research:
Address the questions in your summary:
*How does the information in the article apply to the project problem or proposed intervention?
*Summarize in your own words.
* Include results of the study and how these results are applicable to your project.
* What is the recommendation of the source for clinical practice?
GRADING RUBRIC: PICO
Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%) Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%) Total
PICO question and components
40 points Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision. PICO elements are correctly identified. Outcomes are measurable.
37–40 points Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision. PICO elements are correctly identified. Outcomes but are not measurable.
34–36 points Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision. One PICO element is not correctly identified. Outcomes but are not measurable.
30–33 points Question or nursing problem is identified but is not an independent nursing decision. Several PICO elements are not correctly identified. Outcomes are not measurable or may not be present.
0–29 points 38/40
Practice issue and scope of the problem
20 points *Practice issue/problem is thoroughly described. The need for change is evident. *Practice area is identified. *Identification of the practice issue is clear.
*Scope of the problem is identified.
19–20 points *Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. The need for change is evident.
*Practice area is identified. *Identification of the practice issue is clear.
*Scope of the problem is identified.
17–18 points *Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. The need for change is not obvious.
*Practice area is identified. *Identification of the practice issue is clear.
*Scope of the problem is identified.
15–16 points *Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. Need for change is not obvious.
*Practice issues or scope of the problem are not addressed and/or not accurate.
0–14 points 19/20
Evidence and search terms.
15 points Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered (must include literature search). Uses manageable search terms and ways in which the search can be narrowed if discussed.
14–15 points Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered (must include literature search). Uses manageable search terms. Ways in which the search can be narrowed is not included.
13 points Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered (must include literature search). Search terms are not measurable. Ways in which the search can be narrowed is not included.
11–12 points Types of evidence that should be gathered is not noted or not correct, literature search not identified. Search terms are not measurable or absent. Ways in which the search can be narrowed is not included.
0–10 points 14/15
Total Points 71/75
GRADING RUBRIC: EVIDENCE APPRAISAL
Assignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%) Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%) Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
F (0–75%) Total
Article Selection
30 points Four articles used. At least three articles are peer-reviewed research. Other source is scholarly and appropriate for the change project. Type of source is properly identified.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
 
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
:

Order Now

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!