source: sourse: kornspan, A.S. (2009). Fundamental of sports and exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics.
chapter: caring for athletes”
kornspan offers an overview of how athletic departments try to address the needs of students; athletics at the collage level. First, summarize what you learned from reading that section. then, describe your position on weather collage athletes should be able to form unions.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!

TOPIC: Select a subject of interest. 1) Describe TWO different theories explaining the same psychological process, ex: theories on emotion, learning or personality development, 2) compare and contrast the two theories, and 3) discuss which theory you agree with and why. MAKE SURE THEY ARE THEORIES ADDRESSING THE SAME HUMAN BEHAVIOR OR PROCESS.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!

Informed consent is a standard part of research studies. As part of the IRB application process, researchers create a sample consent form that is submitted with their study protocol. This consent form will be used with participants to inform them of the study and, once the study has been explained, the participants will sign the informed consent form. As part of the process, the informed consent form needs to include a description of what the study involves, including risks and benefits, if the study is confidential, and how the study data is used.

The Unit 3 Assignment will include two parts; the consent form (pdf) and the paper. Both parts should be presented in the following manner with a title, introduction, conclusion, and reference page. Submit the assignment as multiple attachments including the following:

1-2 page paper in a Word document

Completed Informed Consent Form (pdf)

Using the template provided, create a sample informed consent form to conduct a study of interest to you (childhood obesity). The goal is to create a draft of an informed consent form similar to that which a researcher would submit to an IRB board for review. Discuss in 1–2 pages how you would design this study to adhere to ethical guidelines. Be sure to include the five ethical principles (beneficence and maleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, respect for peoples rights and dignity) and how your study will conform to them. Discuss one or two ethical issues that could arise during your study and how you would respond to these issues, as a researcher. Be sure to operationally define your variables and state what scales of measurement would be used, including description of why that scale was chosen.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!

Psychology in Your Life w/ Norton SmartWork Access Code
Author: Grison
ISBN: 9780393250527
Copyright Year: 2014
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company, Incorporated

Source Materials

1. Your textbook chapter on brain and behavior or biological psychology. 2. A YouTube video
a- Background video on brain and behavior (part 1 of 2)

“- Hosts Bradford and Anna give us a special “peek” into the brain during a common interaction—two people recognizing and greeting each other on the street.”

b- Background video on brain and behavior (part 2 of 2)
“- An overview of various parts of the brain, categorized according to their locations and functions.’

3- “6+1 Trait” (c) website. Describes the writing traits by which this assignment will be assessed.
“- Please read the brief description of the traits of:
Ideas, Organization, Voice, Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, and Conventions.”

Writing Prompt

Your best friends invite you over for pizza and a friendly game of cards. Describe how the following parts of the brain are involved during your evening of eating pizza, socializing, and playing cards: Broca’s area, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and occipital lobe. You are encouraged to watch the YouTube videos.
Your text should be 250-750 words long.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!


Leaders are often busy, production oriented, and responsible for outcomes. Therefore, it is not surprising that they are also often criticized for not listening well. Leaders who develop their listening skills and use appropriate listening styles often positively influence organizational culture and employee motivation. For this Application, you will explore three different listening styles and consider how each impacts leader-follower relationships.

To prepare for this assignment:

  • Review the course media "Leadership Competency: Interpersonal Adeptness," with Drs. Thomas and Miller. Focus on reactive, explorative, and attentive listening styles.
  • Think about how each listening style is different and how each style might elicit different responses.
  • Reflect on how the use of each listening style might positively or negatively impact the relationships between leaders and followers.

The assignment: (1-2 pages)

  • Analyze differences between reactive, explorative, and attentive listening.
  • Explain how each listening style might positively and/or negatively impact relationships between leaders and followers. Be specific.

Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list only for those resources not included in the Learning Resources for this course.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!

Please answer the question after read the chapter 1 of Richard Wortley Book called “Psychological Criminology” and use the lecture slides to help.

Answer each question in 1 paragraph approx 50-100 words depending on the question. Don’t need to give reference.


1. Briefly outline the distinction between sociological and psychological approaches to understanding crime.
2. If science cannot answer moral questions, how can it inform moral debates?
3. Briefly describe the following debates as they apply to criminal behaviour:
• Free will/determinism
• Nature/nurture
• Normal/pathological
• Person/situation
4. What is the belief in the “noble savage”? Does it accurately account for differences in industrial and pre-industrial societies?
5. What are the shortcomings of each of these definitions of ‘mental pathology’:
• Mental pathology means he has a disease
• Mental pathology means he is morally sick
• Mental pathology means he is not normal
6. What is the naturalistic fallacy and why is it a fallacy?
7. If a person’s behaviour is determined, can it still be intentional? Why or why not?

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!