Second hand copies are usually available. [The 3rd through 7th editions are also acceptable, although you will have to hunt for the information as page numbers change]
o Use well-developed examples that are fully referenced to illustrate and support your
o Review the section on Academic Honesty in the syllabus.
• Sources
o You must use at least three sources in addition to the topic documents (this can be the
textbook and 2 others from class readings). You may use readings that are not from the class, but these must be

in addition to the 2 from the class readings. Radio interviews, newspapers stories, and other non-academic

sources do not count as a source.
o *Do not use information taken from web sites* (unless specifically directed to do so by me).
o You may use the library or the online databases for additional sources (check with the librarians if you are

unsure how to use these).
o Cite the author’s name and a page number in parentheses after you refer to information taken from a particular

o Keep quotes to a minimum. If you paraphrase make sure your version is completely different from the original.
o Write a list of references at the end of your response, including author’s name, date, and title of each work

listed. You do not need to follow any particular referencing style.
Continued …

Respond to ONE of the following questions:
1. Read Rosaldo (2000) Of Headhunters and Soldiers: Separating Cultural and Ethical Relativism. What does he mean

by the following: “To understand is not to forgive”? Do you agree? Develop your answer in terms of the

relationship among ethnocentrism, cultural relativism and moral (or ethical) relativism. Support your view with

references to the perspective of anthropologists.
2. What is the difference between the popular understanding of culture as “high culture” and the anthropological

understanding of culture? Illustrate your response through specific reference to Geertz’ Deep Play: Notes on the

Balinese Cockfight.
3. Read this bulletin from Survival International, an organization that advocates for the rights of indigenous

peoples. Now read this news story that was on the front page of the New York Times. Comment on the New York Times

story in light of the Survival International Bulletin and what you have learned in Module 2. In other words, I

would like you to decide whether the New York Times article is guilty or not of spreading stereotypes of so-

called “primitive” peoples. (More information on the Nukak from Survival International. We’ll be coming across

them again later in the class. There are a number of images portraying the Nukak way of life – before the impact

of the recent fighting – behind the materials button, which were taken by a colleague of mine, Dr. Gustavo

4. Why is it important to an anthropologist to seek out the “native’s point of view”? Is this

perspective enough to produce a good ethnography?


Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!