Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Use the to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

<Type Traditional (Qualitative or Quantitative) Research Type Here>

Observations (Similarities/Differences)

Methodology

Goals

Data Collection

Use the “” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.

Use the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template” to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Clinical practice issue of translational Research in nephrology
The distinction between structured (practical) and unstructured (theoretical) research in clinical trials
Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology
The three types of translational research (T1, T2 and T3) require a researcher to get directly involved in the variables of a study so as to reach the intended outcome (Elder, 2017). The researcher takes full control of the dependent variables during the entire study. The methodologies are thus;

T1: Observational studies, Phase I and II clinical trials, and Case studies.

T2: Phase III clinical trials, observational studies, evidence synthesis and guidelines.

T3: Dissemination research, diffusion research, implementation research, and Phase IV clinical trials.

Methodology for traditional practices vary as follows;

Qualitative: Focus groups, individual depth interviews, group discussions, and observation (Boyack et al., 2014)

Quantitative: Surveys, Audits or Simulations
Both researches are complex and are hypothesis-oriented for the formulation of clinical decision.

Both studies require researchers to design the methodology and actively participate in the research process (Harrington & Hauskeller, 2014).

Unlike traditional research, experiments in translational research are closely monitored to answer sets of biomedical questions.
Goals
T1: Developing treatments and interventions.

T2: Testing the efficacy as well as effectiveness of the developed treatments and interventions (Ortiz, 2015).

T3: Dissemination and implementation of research for system-wide change
Qualitative: To develop an understanding of underlying reasons and motivations. Also to uncover prevalent trends in thought and opinion (Boyack et al., 2014).

Quantitative: To identify data and generalize results based on a given sample to the population of interest.
Traditional research concerned with an understanding of human behavior and discovery of facts about a given social phenomenon (Boyack et al., 2014).

Translational research on the other hand addresses a health policy with an intention to implement an evidence-based practice in clinical setting.
Data Collection
Data obtained from clinical trials, population-based interventions, practice-based research networks (Ortiz, 2015)
Qualitative: Data collected through participant observation.

Quantitative: Data collected through measuring variables.
Traditional research entails data analysis using various tools while translational research focuses on interpretation of evidence-based research into clinical practice (Elder, 2017).

Translational Research Graphic Organizer
T1 research T2 research T3 research Quantitative Research Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology Tests clinical effects and applicability of findings derived from basic research like social science, psychometrics, research epidemiology, and laboratory tests (Felege, Hahn & Hunter, 2016).
The research is demonstrated using human physiology, proof of concept, fist in humans and phase 1 clinical trials.
Investigators use controlled environments to test new interventions and come up with evidence-based guidelines and clinical applications (Kemp, 2019).
. Investigators explore how one can apply recommendations or guidelines in general practice.
Use delivery dissemination and diffusion research to move evidence-based guidelines into health practice (Kemp, 2019).
.
It offers numerical data that has been synthesized using statistical and mathematical methods (Barnham, 2015).
The produced numerical data helps one predict the future expectations and make the required changes. Both quantitative and translational research are applicable to human subjects and clinical studies. Quantitative research tests diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of illness while translational research bridges science and practice (Barnham, 2015; Kemp, 2019).
Goals To yield knowledge of human physiology and potential for intervention (Kemp, 2019).
To develop treatments and interventions.
To translate basic research into research with humans.
As an interface between basic research and clinical settings, it aims at understanding disease mechanisms and developing them into clinically relevant treatment regimens, diagnostics, and understandings that can be tested in humans (Kemp, 2019).

To provide information on interventions efficacy in optimal settings.
To test the effectiveness and efficacy of interventions and treatments.
To foster routine clinical practice and health decision making by translating new clinical science and knowledge (Robert, 2017).
To use information and insights obtained from basic, clinical and population health research to offer health services. To generate information about the application of interventions in real-world settings.

To disseminate and implement research to generate a system-wide change.
To use evidence derived from clinical trials to come up with guidelines that are applied in patients seen routinely in practice (Robert, 2017).
To transform numerical data into usable statistics.
To come up with facts in research and uncover patterns from measurable data (Barnham, 2015).

Quantitative research carefully and pragmatically test a mature hypothesis in a controlled environment which aids in making discoveries and exploring ideas. It acts as a foundation for translational research and makes problems solvable.
T1, T2, and T3 aim at coming up with clinical and scientific findings that enhance community health, patient outcome and healthcare delivery (Parajuli, Bhattarai & Heera, 2018). The three are interlinked where T1 translates lab tests to clinical trials whereas T2 and T3 apply the clinical trials to the population.
Data Collection Data is collected using case studied, observational studies as well as phase I and II clinical trials (Choi, Tubbs & Oskouian, 2018).

Data is obtained through activities like guidelines development, evidence synthesis, observational studies, and phase III clinical trials (Robert, 2017).

Activities include phase IV clinical trials, diffusion research, implementation research and dissemination research (Kemp, 2019).
Use of systematic observation, longitudinal studies, interviews, surveys, website interceptors, and online polls (Barnham, 2015).

A method of data collection used across is observation. It is used in T1 and T2 research as well as in quantitative research. Both translational and quantitative research tries to quantify data into substantial results (Parajuli, Bhattarai & Heera, 2018). The two features methods like clinical trials, interviews, and surveys that provide testable real data.

References
Barnham, C. (2015). Quantitative and qualitative research: Perceptual foundations. International Journal of Market Research, 57(6), 837-854.
Choi, P. J., Tubbs, R. S., & Oskouian, R. J. (2018). The current trend of the translational research paradigm. Cureus, 10(3).
Felege, C., Hahn, E., & Hunter, C. (2016). Bench, bedside, curbside, and home: Translational research to include transformative change using educational research. Journal of Research Practice, 12(2), P1.
Kemp, L. (2019). Translational research: Bridging the chasm between new knowledge and useful knowledge. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, 367-389.
Parajuli, S. B., Bhattarai, P., & Heera, K. C. (2018). Translational research: Current status, challenges and future strategies in Nepal. Nepalese Heart Journal, 15(2), 3-8.
Robert, J. S. (2017). Is there a role for communication studies in translational research?. Review of Communication, 17(3), 214-223.

Translational Research Graphic Organizer
100.0%
Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology
25.0%
A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included.
A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present.
A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals
25.0%
A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included.
A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of research in relation to goals is present.
A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection
25.0%
A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included.
A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present.
A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Required Sources
5.0%
Sources are not included.
Number of required sources is only partially met.
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Presentation
10.0%
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0%
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

NUR 550 DQ 1
In your own words, define translational research and how it connects to your role, either individually or in collective practice. Describe how you might use it in your current or anticipated future setting.

NUR 550 DQ 2
Using the GCU Library (notably the GCU Library: Nursing and Health Sciences Research Guide), find a database, journal, or other collection of resources that focuses on translational research. Select a population health problem or issue of interest from the available studies. What type of translational research is used for the study? Provide rationale as to why this is the best type of translational research is best for the study, and explain why translational research is the most appropriate approach for this problem or population.

DQ are due Saturday and Monday but I will like to receive them at least 1 day prior

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!