Unit 7: Discussion – CDC Chronic Disease Indicator Tool

HC 491 Week 7 Discussion Assignment Help

Unit 7: Discussion – CDC Chronic Disease Indicator Tool

Introduction

As a population health coordinator for a community hospital, you are asked to put a treatment versus prevention discussion together for a group of advanced practice providers who work in family practices.   You are asked to talk about the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) chronic disease indicator tool so that the providers understand the tool and the data stored on the site. 

This site enables public health professionals to retrieve uniformly defined state and selected metropolitan-level data for chronic diseases and risk factors that have a substantial impact on public health. These indicators are essential for surveillance, prioritization, and evaluation of public health interventions.

Requirements

  • This report should be prepared as a Microsoft™ Word document, and then attached to the unit discussion thread. There is no minimum or maximum in terms of the word count; however, the response should explicitly address all required components of this discussion assignment.
  • The document should not be prepared consistent with the APA writing style (6th edition) except that the in-text citations (if applicable) and references should be properly formatted.
  • The final product should reflect cognitive processing at the knowledge (remember), understanding, and application levels.
  • Refer to Assignments and Grading for more information.

 

  1. Initial Post: Based on their observations, in this scenario, and upon a careful review of the available literature, the student is to consider him or herself to be the population health coordinator for a community hospital.
  2. The student is to prepare a memo that explains key features of the chronic disease indicator tool.
  3. You will need to explain the type of data the indicators could provide to the provider and their particular communities.
  4. You should emphasize why stakeholder participation is important in population health management.
  5. Peer Responses: You are expected to read the initial posting of at least TWO peers, and then provide thoughtful comments addressing the following:
  6. Point out what you perceived to be the strengths of the initial posting along with supporting rationale.
  7. Identify specific opportunities for improvement with regard to the content in the initial posting. Furthermore, you should provide supporting rationale for your stated position, as well as concrete suggestions and guidance intended to strengthen the effectiveness of the content.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!